• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Adlex Solicitors

UK internet and domain name lawyers

Call us now: 0207 317 8404   Email us now

Request Callback

  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Website and App Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy and GDPR
      • Intro
      • Privacy Policies
      • Cookies and GDPR
    • Contracts
      • Intro
      • Influencer Contracts
      • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
      • Web Hosting Contracts
      • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
      • SEO Contracts
      • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
    • Disputes
      • Intro
      • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
        • Introductory Guide to Domain Name Disputes
        • UDRP
        • Nominet’s DRS
        • Cybersquatting
        • Domain Name Hijacking
        • Domain Name Law
        • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
        • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
        • Free Legal Opinion
      • Online Copyright Infringement
      • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
    • Content Removal
      • Intro
      • Removal From Google Search Results
      • Internet Defamation
      • Right to be Forgotten
      • Removing Google reviews
      • Removal From Websites
      • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media
  • Who We Are
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home  ›  What We Do  ›  Disputes  ›  Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting  ›  UDRP

Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Complaints

What is the UDRP?

The UDRP (abbreviation for Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy) is the primary domain name dispute resolution policy for resolving gTLD disputes, although additional measures are available. It was set up following a report by the United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) on the misuse of trade marks in domain names.

This recommended the establishment of a mandatory arbitration procedure to deal with ‘abusive’ registrations – one that might be quicker and less expensive than a court case.

Official ICANN-authorised dispute resolution service providers manage UDRP disputes. See below.

What kinds of domain names are covered by the UDRP?

The UDRP applies to traditional “gTLD” domain names such as  .com, .net. It also covers the “new gTLDs” (e.g., .club, .loan etc) as well as some country domains and other kinds of domain names such as “uk.com”.

What makes the UDRP legally binding?

The contract under which someone registers a domain name. When the UDRP is included, they agree to participate in UDRP arbitration in the event of a dispute. Also, under the UDRP, registering a relevant domain name requires the person or company to ‘represent and warrant’ that doing so ‘will not infringe upon or otherwise violate the rights of any third party.

Where do you file a UDRP complaint and how much does it cost?

There are a number of bodies accredited to handle UDRP cases. These include the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). The providers set the official fees. Generally, they charge complainants around US$1300 – $1500 fee to file a UDRP complaint for a single domain name. But they charge more (around $4,000) if the complainant opts for a 3-person panel (rather than the normal single-person panel). Usually the respondent only pays if it requests a 3-person panel. If so, the fee is split equally between the parties. The official fees exclude the legal costs involved in preparing complaints / responses.

What do you have to prove?

To make a successful claim under the UDRP, a company or individual must establish three things:

  1. That the domain name in dispute is the same as, or confusingly similar to, one of their registered or unregistered trade marks, such as an actively used business name. The business name category can extend to performers, writers and artists whose personal name has brand value.
  2. That the domain name registrant does not have any legitimate rights to it, e.g. there is no “bona fide” offering of goods or services.
  3. That the registered domain name was registered is being used in bad faith – i.e. to illicitly target the trade mark owner in some way.

For the purposes of the UDRP, bad faith is likely to be established if the domain name was initially registered, and has since been used, for the sole purpose of:

  • Selling or renting it back to the owner of the related trade mark at a profit, even if they have not actually approached the trade mark owner at the time of the complaint
  • To prevent the owner of the related trade mark from using it
  • To disrupt the trade mark owner’s business
  • To confuse potential customers looking for the trade mark owner’s business

The above is not an exhaustive list. Other factors can be taken into consideration, such as registrants being uncooperative, not responding to legal emails or letters, or registering multiple questionable domain names.

A domain name owner who can demonstrate legitimacy has a good chance of defending their case, – if, for example, they are using a non-misleading domain name to operate a genuine fan site that is not being used for commercial gain.

Obviously, circumstances will vary widely. But, in any case, you have to provide sufficient information and evidence to cover all of the points required under the UDRP. Otherwise the UDRP complaint will fail.

How long does it take?

In our experience, UDRP cases tends to be take anywhere from six to ten weeks, depending on whether they are contested and how complicated they become.

What are the possible outcomes?

If you are a successful UDRP complainant, the normal outcome is transfer of the domain name in dispute – usually the main objective of those filing UDRP proceedings. Very occasionally the panellist will cancel the domain name. You can’t recover compensation or legal costs.

Any necessary changes to the registration of a domain name will be made by the registrar of the domain name within ten days of a decision.

UDRP decisions are sometimes overturned in the courts. However, it is worth noting the registrant cannot take transfer it to anyone else for the duration of the domain name dispute process.

The UDRP is not dependent on legal jurisdiction and can be used internationally, i.e., it doesn’t matter where the registrant is based.

UDRP decisions are public by default.

Are previous UDRP cases relevant?

Potentially yes – but they now run into the tens of thousands! So, apart from some well-known ground-breaking UDRP decisions, it’s more important to be aware of the general trends than individual cases. Fortunately, WIPO have prepared a very detailed and thorough case overview, available on its website. This explains areas of consensus, and indeed division, amongst panellists. It’s important to be aware of these issues and deploy them in UDRP filings, whether by the complainant or respondent.

Can the loser appeal?

No. There is no provision within the UDRP for appeals. The only option is to go to court assuming there is a legal basis to do so. And often there isn’t. It’s therefore important to get the UDRP complaint right first time. You won’t get a second chance – except in rare cases. For example, if you discover something crucial that you couldn’t have known about when you filed the original UDRP complaint).

UDRP v court?

An alternative to the UDRP is to go to court based on a legal cause of action such as passing off or trade mark infringement. But the UDRP has the advantage of being far quicker and cheaper than undertaking legal proceedings. And it avoids difficulties of working out which country’s courts can hear the dispute and enforcing court awards. This is particular problem when the domain name registrant is abroad. These days, the vast majority of domain name disputes go to the UDRP rather than court.

Talk to us

We are expert domain name dispute solicitors – click to find out more. Contact us for a free initial legal opinion!

Domain Expertise  Free Opinion

Primary Sidebar

  • Website and App Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy and GDPR
    • Intro
    • Privacy Policies
    • Cookies and GDPR
  • Contracts
    • Intro
    • Influencer Contracts
    • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
    • Web Hosting Contracts
    • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
    • SEO Contracts
    • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
  • Disputes
    • Intro
    • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
      • Introductory Guide to Domain Name Disputes
      • UDRP
      • Nominet’s DRS
      • Cybersquatting
      • Domain Name Hijacking
      • Domain Name Law
      • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
      • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
      • Free Legal Opinion
    • Online Copyright Infringement
    • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
  • Content Removal
    • Intro
    • Removal From Google Search Results
    • Internet Defamation
    • Right to be Forgotten
    • Removing Google reviews
    • Removal From Websites
    • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media

Blog Categories

  • Domain Name Disputes
  • Internet Content Removal
  • Online Child Safety
  • Online Reviews
  • Online Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy and GDPR

Twitter

  • Twitter

Recent Blog Posts

  • New UK Fake Review Rules: What Businesses Need to Know
  • New UK Online Subscription Rules and Regulations: A Guide for Website/App Operators
  • Online Child Safety Compliance: What UK Businesses Need to Know
  • 10 Tips for Defending a Domain Name Dispute Complaint
  • Guidance on Designing your Website / App for Children’s Privacy

How Adlex Solicitors Can Help You

For a free initial chat, call Adam of Adlex now on 0207 317 8404 or request a callback or email.

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Privacy and Cookies Policy
  • Complaints

© Adlex Solicitors 2001 - 2025. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 344672).

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}