• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Adlex Solicitors

UK internet and domain name lawyers

Call us now: 0207 317 8404   Email us now

Request Callback

  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Website and App Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy and GDPR
      • Intro
      • Privacy Policies
      • Cookies and GDPR
    • Contracts
      • Intro
      • Influencer Contracts
      • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
      • Web Hosting Contracts
      • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
      • SEO Contracts
      • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
    • Disputes
      • Intro
      • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
        • Introductory Guide to Domain Name Disputes
        • UDRP
        • Nominet’s DRS
        • Cybersquatting
        • Domain Name Hijacking
        • Domain Name Law
        • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
        • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
        • Free Legal Opinion
      • Online Copyright Infringement
      • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
    • Content Removal
      • Intro
      • Removal From Google Search Results
      • Internet Defamation
      • Right to be Forgotten
      • Removing Google reviews
      • Removal From Websites
      • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media
  • Who We Are
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Home  ›  What We Do  ›  Disputes  ›  Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting  ›  Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise

Domain Name Lawyer & Cybersquatting Attorney

Domain name lawyers

Adlex Solicitors have been heavily involved in domain name disputes and related legal issues for more than 20 years. We have acted as lawyers for parties large and small in hundreds of domain name arbitration cases. We have represented both complainants and respondents. Visit the WIPO domain dispute search page for examples of such cases.

Domain name dispute attorney and panellist

Our principal, Adam Taylor, is a panellist with leading domain name arbitration bodies.

Since 2004 he has been a member of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)’s Domain Name Panel. For WIPO, Adam arbitrates domain name disputes under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP), considering gTLDs such as ‘.com’.

Please see his WIPO professional profile. If you visit the WIPO domain dispute search page, you’ll find a list of over 200 domain name cases on that he has adjudicated.

Adam has also been a panellist (‘Independent Expert’) for Nominet UK’s Dispute Resolution Service (DRS) since its launch in 2001. The DRS covers .uk domain names. To see the more than 100 .uk decisions that have been issued by Adam, visit the Nominet DRS decisions search tool, select Search, type Expert, then search for Adam Taylor.

Adam attends and presents at the annual WIPO panellists conference in Geneva, as well as Nominet Experts’ meetings in Oxford and London. This enables him to keep abreast of all the latest domain name disputes and cybersquatting issues.

Helping complainants

If someone registers a domain name similar to a registered trade mark in your possession or to a name you have been using even if not registered, they may well have infringed your intellectual property rights or breached your copyright, even if they didn’t specifically set out to target you.

If they are deliberately trying to confuse customers or profit from your brand, this is usually taken as evidence they are operating in bad faith and that the registration was in ‘bad faith’ or ‘abusive’.

Misappropriating domain names is commonly known as cybersquatting. The motive for this practice is usually financial. The cybersquatters may hope to sell the domain name on to its rightful owners for profit, for example, or redirect stray potential customers to sites run by rivals of the trade mark owner, or by the cybersquatters themselves. They often buy up multiple variations of existing domains such as common misspellings in order to maximise financial gain.

We can advise, help you locate the registrants and respond firmly to the infringement.

The courts are certainly an option when you have a strong case for intellectual property infringement and are keen to press for damages and/or the recovery of your legal costs.

Arbitration options

However, while legal action may sometimes be the right course, well-established arbitration procedures may be a better choice in your case. Typically, these cost less and are less time-consuming than court action.

The UDRP is administered by the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). It provides a method for formally requesting the transfer or return of disputed domain names. The claimant must be able to demonstrate that:

  • the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to their trade mark
  • the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name, and
  • that it was both registered and has since been used in bad faith

These overlap with the requirements for legal action in court. A key difference, however, is that it is not possible to claim damages or costs under the UDRP.

If your claim is successful, the most likely outcome is that the disputed domain will be transferred to you.

Meanwhile, the DRS is administered by Nominet, based in Oxford, who administer the ‘.uk’ ccTLDs that is, remarkably, the fourth most widely used TLD in the world if you include is older variant ‘.co.uk’. (The top three are ‘.com’, ‘.net’ and ‘.de’.)

The DRS is similar to the UDRP, but there are differences. In particular, participants are offered the opportunity to engage in free, non-binding mediation in order to try and resolve the dispute between them. The mediation process is delivered by a strictly neutral third party who tries to encourage each side to reach an agreement, and, if they are successful, Nominet makes any required changes to the domain ownership and the process duly ends. No fee is payable in such circumstances.

But if mediation is unsuccessful and the DRS procedure continues, the losing party can appeal the eventual decision by Nominet’s designated ‘Expert’ – the equivalent of a UDRP panellist.

Experts take an arbitrator-like role in deciding whether or not the disputed domain name should be transferred, suspended, or remain with its current owners. Appeals are heard by a panel of three experts. By contrast, there is no right of appeal under the UDRP. To date, only a handful of DRS participants have appealed. But the option remains.

Helping claimants

We recommend seeking legal action from an experienced domain name dispute lawyer as soon as you can. This is a complex area of law that may involve multiple countries.

Your brand and intellectual property are valuable components of your business, important intangible assets. You have worked hard to create them and imbue them with value and you should work just as hard to protect them from misappropriation by third parties.

Don’t delay. The first step is to develop a strategy that will help you regain control and encourage the infringing party cease their behaviour. Your lawyer will help you figure out what is needed to achieve that aim.

What’s our objective as domain name lawyers, when acting for trade mark owners?

Simply to recover the domain name as quickly, simply and cost-effectively as possible. We do our utmost to help clients win their cases without the need to incur the costs of domain name recovery proceedings whenever we are able to do so. Sometimes recovery proceedings are unavoidable but we think that our long-standing experience can help make the difference. We have a very good idea of what it takes to succeed and how to avoid the potential pitfalls.

We have access to a range of investigative tools including domain name and website archive records. These can help uncover patterns of misconduct by domain name registrants.

Such evidence is often the difference between winning and losing. For example, a respondent once claimed that he had registered a domain name because it was descriptive and not just because it was also our client’s name. However, we uncovered another domain name connected with that respondent that mirrored another competitor in the same industry. The UDRP panellist cited that other domain as a key factor showing bad faith by the respondent.

It can be difficult for lawyers who are not specialists in the area to know when, how and where to find that critical extra evidence.

Structuring pre-action correspondence correctly is also important. What registrants say – or don’t say – in response, often supports the case made by the complainants.

Helping registrants

If you are a domain name owner and find yourself on the receiving end of a complaint, don’t despair. It is certainly possible to defend yourself and win your case – especially if you can demonstrate legitimate rights to the name in dispute, if you have a track record of using it for legitimate reasons and you have not been behaving in an obviously abusive manner, such as trying to sell the name back to the complainant for a profit.

What’s our object when acting as solicitors for registrants/respondents?

Simply to defend the case as robustly and cost-effectively as possible. We always recommend attempting to negotiate a settlement if at all possible. We will provide guidance on your best options – a carefully considered strategy with full consideration of the risks and opportunities presented by different courses of action.

If you believe your valuable intellectual property has been compromised, contact us today for a free initial legal opinion on your situation!

Free Opinion

We are expert domain name dispute solicitors. Call our highly experienced domain name dispute lawyer Adam Taylor for an initial chat on 0207 317 8404.

Adam and his team at Adlex are total professionals in domain name disputes and internet law. They were recommended to us and I in turn have recommended them over and over again since our first work together. They took an incredibly difficult case, made something of it and got us the ultimate result we needed. We continue to work with Adlex protecting and acquiring our IP worldwide.

Matt Mansell, CEO, Domainmonster.com Adlex Solicitor Testimonial

You will find many other testimonials from clients about our domain name disputes and cybersquatting service, showing how we can help.

Primary Sidebar

  • Website and App Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy and GDPR
    • Intro
    • Privacy Policies
    • Cookies and GDPR
  • Contracts
    • Intro
    • Influencer Contracts
    • Website / App Design and Development Contracts
    • Web Hosting Contracts
    • White Label and Content Distribution Contracts
    • SEO Contracts
    • Internet Affiliate, Advertising and Marketing Contracts
  • Disputes
    • Intro
    • Domain Name Disputes and Cybersquatting
      • Introductory Guide to Domain Name Disputes
      • UDRP
      • Nominet’s DRS
      • Cybersquatting
      • Domain Name Hijacking
      • Domain Name Law
      • Domain Names and Trade Marks / Passing Off
      • Adlex’s Domain Name Legal Expertise
      • Free Legal Opinion
    • Online Copyright Infringement
    • Internet Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
  • Content Removal
    • Intro
    • Removal From Google Search Results
    • Internet Defamation
    • Right to be Forgotten
    • Removing Google reviews
    • Removal From Websites
    • Removal From Facebook and Other Social Media

Blog Categories

  • Domain Name Disputes
  • Internet Content Removal
  • Online Child Safety
  • Online Reviews
  • Online Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy and GDPR

Twitter

  • Twitter

Recent Blog Posts

  • New UK Fake Review Rules: What Businesses Need to Know
  • New UK Online Subscription Rules and Regulations: A Guide for Website/App Operators
  • Online Child Safety Compliance: What UK Businesses Need to Know
  • 10 Tips for Defending a Domain Name Dispute Complaint
  • Guidance on Designing your Website / App for Children’s Privacy

How Adlex Solicitors Can Help You

For a free initial chat, call Adam of Adlex now on 0207 317 8404 or request a callback or email.

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Privacy and Cookies Policy
  • Complaints

© Adlex Solicitors 2001 - 2025. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 344672).

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}